How disclosures should appear

If a page contains a meaningful commercial relationship, the disclosure should be visible near the relevant content and supported by this site-wide page. A reader should not have to dig through a footer to understand that a commercial relationship exists.

This is meant to complement the broader standards on the editorial policy page, not replace them. Disclosure explains the money angle; it does not excuse weak or misleading recommendations.

How editorial independence is supposed to work

If a page ever earns money, that should not rewrite the underlying editorial question: is this actually a good fit for the reader, and who should skip it?

That expectation should hold across roundups, comparisons, and reviews. A monetized link is supposed to follow the recommendation, not create it.

Questions readers usually ask about affiliate disclosure

Does AccountantToolkit currently use affiliate links?

As of the March 21, 2026 update, the primary product CTAs in this site still point to official vendor pages rather than placeholder affiliate-tracking URLs. That may change later if affiliate programs are approved.

What should affiliate relationships never change?

Affiliate relationships should not rewrite rankings, soften major caveats, hide weaknesses, or replace official-source verification for pricing, trial terms, or product details.

How should disclosures appear on the site?

If a page includes a meaningful commercial relationship, the disclosure should be visible near the relevant content and supported by this site-wide disclosure page.

What should readers still verify before buying?

Readers should still verify current pricing, plan names, free-plan rules, trial offers, and usage limits on the official vendor site before making a purchase decision.